Table 3.
Linear regression analysis of MLBW and obesity-related outcomes
| Control (n = 450) | MLBW (n = 227) | |
|---|---|---|
| BMI Z score | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | −0.22 (−1.09, 0.66) |
| Model 2 | Ref | −0.18 (−1.03, 0.67) |
| Model 3 | Ref | −0.14 (−0.67, 0.39) |
| Model 4 | Ref | −0.21 (−1.07, 0.66) |
| Model 5 | Ref | −0.13 (−0.60, 0.31) |
| WC | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.25 (−0.10, 0.60) |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.60 (0.24, 0.96)* |
| Model 3 | Ref | 0.35 (0.07, 0.63)* |
| Model 4 | Ref | 0.37 (0.10, 0.54)* |
| Model 5 | Ref | 0.32 (0.05, 0.59)* |
| Waist/hip ratio | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.08 (−0.19, 0.35) |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.07 (−0.20, 0.34) |
| Model 3 | Ref | 0.03 (−0.25, 0.30) |
| Model 4 | Ref | 0.05 (−0.22, 0.33) |
| Model 5 | Ref | 0.09 (−0.07, 0.26) |
| Waist/height ratio | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | −0.11 (−0.33, 0.12) |
| Model 2 | Ref | −0.14 (−0.37, 0.09) |
| Model 3 | Ref | −0.19 (−0.42, 0.04) |
| Model 4 | Ref | −0.16 (−0.39, 0.07) |
| Model 5 | Ref | −0.12 (−0.35, 0.11) |
| SF | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.63 (0.27, 1.53)* |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.67 (0.31, 1.03)* |
| Model 3 | Ref | 0.35 (0.02, 0.69)* |
| Model 4 | Ref | 0.60 (0.25, 0.95)* |
| Model 5 | Ref | 0.63 (0.35, 0.91)* |
| Body fat percentage | ||
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.27 (−0.03, 0.51) |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.64 (0.31, 0.97)* |
| Model 3 | Ref | 0.29 (0.03, 0.55)* |
| Model 4 | Ref | 0.53 (0.21, 0.85)* |
| Model 5 | Ref | 0.28 (0.07, 0.49)* |
Model 1 analysis was adjusted for sex, age (y), gestation age at birth, breastfeeding duration, PA group, sedentary time and feeling system disorder, maternal age, parental BMI, parent with a university degree, smoking or passive smoking during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertension during pregnancy, caesarean section, Apgar score 5 min after birth, and household income; model 2: model 1 + children BMI Z score; model 3: model 2 + ADHD; model 4: model 2 + satiety responsiveness; and model 5: model 2 + emotional overeating.
*
p < 0.05.