Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 11;15(2):118–134. doi: 10.1159/000521913

Table 1.

Prevalence of severe obesity in children and adolescents

Author, reference, country Years presented in the table Age-group, years Children with severe obesity, % Type of study Classification Participant in the presented years, n
Skinner et al. [13] USA 2015–2016 Class II Class III Nationally representative data >120% of 95th percentile and >140% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 3,340
2–19 6 (4.3, 7.6) 1.9 (1, 2.9)
2–5 1.8 (0.6, 3.0) 0.2 (−0.1, 0.4)
6–8 5.1 (3.2, 7.1) 1.4 (0.5, 2.3)
9–11 5.3 (2.9, 7.7) 1.0 (0.4, 1.7)
12–15 7.5 (4.2, 10.8) 2.2 (0.9, 3.4)
16–19 9.5 (5.8, 13.1) 4.5 (1.7, 7.4)

Pan et al. [10] USA 2014 2–4 1.96 Serial cross-sectional national data ≥120% of 95th percentile, CDC cut-off 3,016,487
2 1.13
3 2.10
4 3.12

Marcus et al. [27] USA 2006 12 6.9 School-based screening >99th percentile CDC cut-off 6,365

Skelton et al. [32] USA 1999–2004 2–19 3.8 Nationally representative data >99th percentile CDC cut-off 12,384
2–5 4.2
6–11 4.0
12–19 3.4

Flores and Lin [26] USA 2007–2008 5.6±0.03 5.7 The National Center for Education Statistics Institute of Education Sciences (IES) >99th percentile CDC cut-off 14,000

Robbins et al. [11] Philadelphia 2012–2013 5–18 7.3 Philadelphia public schoolchildren ≥120% of 95th percentile, CDC cutoff 88,798

Lohrmann et al. [33] Pennsylvania Pre k–5G 12.5 National data BMI ≥97 percentile CDC cut-off 212,055
6G–8 14.9
G9–12 13.9

Nguyen et al. [1]
Philadelphia
2010
3–17 7.7 (5.8–9.9) 8 public community health centers >120% of 95th percentile, CDC cut-off 691
3–5 6 (3–11)
6–8 7 (3–13)
9–12 8 (5–13)
13–17 8 (5–13)

Kharofa et al. [6] Cincinnati OH 2012–2014 Class II Class III Chart review of children >120% of 95th percentile and 140% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 217,037
2–18 4.7 2.7
2–5 1.6 0.7
6–11 5.0 2.4
12–18 6.3 4.3

Day et al. [3] New York City 2010–2011 5–14 5.7 NYC public school students >120% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 635,257
5–6 3.7
7–10 6.0
11–14 6.5

Lo et al. [8] Northern California 2007–2010 3–5 1.6 Kaiser Permanente Northern California >120% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 42,559

Lo et al. [7] Northern California 2007–2010 6–17 5.6 Kaiser Permanente Northern California >120% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 117,618
6–11 5.3
12–17 5.8

Koebnick [47] Southern California 2007–2008 2–19 6.4 Kaiser Permanente Southern California >120% of 95th percentile, CDC cut-off 710,949
2–5 2.5
6–11 7.4
12–19 7.7

Ball et al. [17] Edmonton Calgary
Alberta, Canada
2017
4–6 2.16 BMI Z >3SD WHO cut-off 16,595

Carsley et al. [18] Toronto, Canada 2009–2015 0–6 1.0 Practice-based research network in BMI Z >3SD
WHO cut-off [≥99.9th]
6,364
0–2 0.5
2–5 1.3
5–6 2.1

Carsley et al. [34] Ontario, Canada 2014–2015 <4 0.9 (0.7–1.0) Electronic Medical Records Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD) BMI Z >3SD
WHO cut-off [≥99.9th]
31,272
5–9 2.7 (2.3–3.1)
10–14 2.9 (2.4–3.3)
15–18 3.7 (3.1–4.3)

Satkunam et al. [12] Ontario, Canada 2014–2016 1.5–2 0.3 (0.2–0.6) The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!) and BORN Ontario 120% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 4,481

Jimenez Cruz et al. [35] Mexico Tijuana and Ensenada 2007 6–12 5.2 Survey ≥99th percentile CDC cut-off 2,690

Shackleton et al. [38] New Zealand 2015–2016 4 2.9 (2.9, 3.0) A national screening program ≥99.7th percentile WHO cut-off 56,541

Farrant et al. [21] New Zealand 2007 13–18 2.5 (1.9–3.1) Nationally representative sample BMI >35 kg/m2 9,107
<13 2.6 (1.7–3.5) IOTF cut-off
14 2.1 (1.1–3.2)
15 2.6 (1.8–3.5)
16 2.5 (1.7–3.5)
>17 2.7 (1.6–3.8)

Utter et al. [22] New Zealand 2012 13–18 3.7 (2.5, 5.0) Nationally representative sample BMI >35 kg/m2 IOTF cut-off 8,372

Garnett et al. [5]
Australia
2012
7–15 Class II 2.0 Class III 0.5 Australian cross-sectional surveys >120% of 95th percentile and > 140% of 95th percentile CDC cut-off 2,940

Xu et al. [23]
Australia
2014
7–15 1.9 Cross-sectional Australian database BMI >35 kg/m2 IOTF cut-off [≥99.8th] 2,079

Cho et al. [29] Korea
2007–2014
10–18 Class II
5.9 (5.2, 6.6)
Class III 0.9 (0.6, 1.1) National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys >120% of 95th percentile and > 140% of 95th percentile
Korean growth curve
7,197

Nam et al. [9] 2–19 2.1 (1.6–2.7) Korea Centers for Disease >120% of 95th percentile 3,226
Korea 2–9 0.6 (0.3–1.3) Control and Prevention CDC cut-off
2013–2014 10–19 3.0 (2.2–4.0)

Chen et al. [36] Xiamen, China 2017 2–7 0.28 Cross-sectional survey, kindergarten Weight-for height
>50% reference population
WHO cut-off
21,883

Zhang [24] Girls Boys National surveys BMI >35 kg/m2 9,719
China 7–18 1.29 2.73 IOTF cut-off
2014 7–12 1.95 3.93
13–18 0.63 1.51

Ells et al. [30] Girls Boys NCMP 99.9th percentile of the 1,076,824
United Kingdom 4–5 1.1 1.5 British 1990 (UK90) growth
2012–2013 10–11 1.2 1.5 reference

Beynon and Bailey [40] Walles 4–5 3.1 (3.0–3.2) CMP 99.6th percentile Royal College of Paediatrics 34,163
2017–2018

Bohn et al. [42] Germany 2015 <21 12.7 APR ≥99.5th percentile for age and sex 4,196

Segna et al. [39] Austria 2003–2004 2–16 2.1 Viennese sample of children and adolescents BMI ≥99.5th percentile of German national reference 24,989
2–4 1.8
4–7 2.4
7–10 2.5
10–1 1.3
13–16 1.2

Cadenas-Sanchez et al. [41] Spain 2014–2015 4.6±0.9 Class II Class III PREFIT project >120% of 95th percentile 3,178
1.2 1.3 and > 140% of 95th percentile WHO cut-off

van Dommelen et al. [15] Holland 1980–2009 2–18 Girls Boys National Dutch Growth Studies >120% of 95th percentile 10,894
2–5 1.00 0.53 WHO cut-off
6–11 0.63 0.63
12–18 0.17 0.60

Twig et al. [14] 17 Girls Boys National data >120% of 95th percentile and > 140% of 95th percentile 63,652
Israel Class II Class II
2015 1.2 1.9
Class III Class III CDC cut-off
0.4 0.5

El Mouzan et al. [19] Saudi Arabia 2005 5–18 2 Cross-sectional sample from a stratified listing based on the population census BMI >3 SDS 19,317
5–12 1.5 WHO cut-off
13–18 2.4

AlBlooshi et al. [25] 3–6 3.3 Population-based study BMI ≥99th percentile 44,942
Ras Al-Khaimah 7–10 3.8 CDC cut-off
United Arab Emirates 11–14 5.7
2014–2015 15–18 8.8
Total, N 6,542,161

The CDC cut-off of > 120% of the 95th percentile and WHO cut-off of zBMI >3, applied to the age and sex standardized. zBMI scores from WHO growth reference charts were used to estimate prevalence of severe obesity. IOTF, International Obesity Task Force; NCMP, National Child Measurement Programme; CMP, Childhood Measurement Programme; APV, Adiposity Patients Registry; BORN, Better Outcomes Registry and Network.