Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 7;12:852348. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.852348

Table 2.

Comparison of the discriminating performance of the Rad score clinical nomogram and radiomics nomograms built by incorporating clinical risk factors and Rad score calculated from different MRI sequences.

Model Training cohort Validation cohort
C-index 95% CI C-index 95% CI
Rad score-T1 0.626 0.602–0.650 0.599 0.562–0.636
Rad score-T1C 0.592 0.568–0.616 0.613 0.578–0.648
Rad score-T2 0.656 0.631–0.681 0.575 0.536–0.614
Rad score-MS 0.731 0.709–0.753 0.807 0.782–0.832
Clinical nomogram 0.766 0.744–0.788 0.743 0.724–0.762
Radiomics nomogram-T1 0.789 0.768–0.810 0.795 0.781–0.809
Radiomics nomogram-T1C 0.795 0.775–0.815 0.769 0.736–0.802
Radiomics nomogram-T2 0.800 0.780–0.820 0.784 0.756–0.812
Radiomics nomogram-MS 0.827 0.809–0.845 0.836 0.815–0.857