Table 2.
Identification success rates obtained using NJ tree and local blast analysis methods for each single candidate barcodes and combinations of them.
| Single candidate barcodes and combinations of them | NJ tree | Similarity-based |
|---|---|---|
| Method* | Method (BLAST) | |
| ITS | 84.85% (28/33) | 84.85% (28/33) |
| matK | 31.25% (10/32) | 31.25% (10/32) |
| psbA-tmH | 33.33% (10/30) | 33.33% (10/30) |
| rbcL | 16.67% (5/30) | 16.67% (5/30) |
| ITS + matK | 84.38% (27/32) | 84.38% (27/32) |
| ITS + rbcL | 80.00% (24/30) | 80.00% (24/30) |
| ITS + psbA-tmH | 83.33% (25/30) | 83.33% (25/30) |
| matK + psbA-tmH | 46.67% (14/30) | 46.67% (14/30) |
| matK + rbcL | 33.33% (10/30) | 33.33% (10/30) |
| psbA-tmH + rbcL | 33.33% (10/30) | 33.33% (10/30) |
| ITS + matK + psbA-tmH | 80.00% (24/30) | 80.00% (24/30) |
| ITS + matK + rbcL | 80.00% (24/30) | 80.00% (24/30) |
| ITS + psbA-tmH + rbcL | 83.33% (25/30) | 83.33% (25/30) |
| matK + psbA-tmH + rbcL | 43.33% (13/30) | 43.33% (13/30) |
| ITS + matK + psbA-tmH + rbcL | 83.33% (25/30) | 83.33% (25/30) |
*
Based on the proportion of monophyletic species with > 60% bootstrapping.