Table 6.

Independent association between CuNET^a and sexual health factors among a cross-sectional sample of sexually active forcibly displaced adolescents living in the slums of Kampala (N=100)^b.

			Values		Recent consistent condom use				Values		Access to SRHc services				Values			STId testing (Ever)
					aORe (95% CI)		P value				aOR (95% CI)		P value				aOR (95% CI)			P value
CuNet, mean (SD)			24.31 (8.46)		1.73 (1.24-2.41)		.001 f		21.13 (8.60)		1.51 (0.99-2.30)		.05		14.31 (11.14)		0.90 (0.64-1.26)			.54
Age (years), mean (SD)			17.96 (0.96)		0.92 (0.33-4.05)		.84		17.60 (1.07)		0.26 (0.09-0.78)		.02		18.34 (0.97)		2.49 (1.19-5.22)			.02
Gender (ref boys), n (%)
	Girls	21 (80.8)		0.83 (0.19-3.67)		.81		19 (73.1)		0.79 (0.08-8.14)		.85		48 (96)		0.09 (0.01-0.89)			.04
	Boys	5 (19.2)		N/Ag		N/A		7 (26.9)		N/A		N/A		2 (4)		N/A			N/A
Mobile phone ownership (ref no mobile phone), n (%)
	Yes	24 (92.3)		0.23 (0.04-1.51)		.13		12 (80)		0.37 (0.04-3.51)		.39		27 (84.4)		0.51 (0.51-12.36)			.26
	No	2 (8.7)		N/A		N/A		3 (20)		N/A		N/A		5 (15.6)		N/A			N/A
Dating relationship (ref no dating relation), n (%)
	Dating	26 (100)		1.15 (0.33-2.41)		.83		N/A		N/A		N/A		30 (93.8)		0.28 (0.07-1.16)			.08
	Not dating	0 (0)		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		2 (6.3)		N/A			N/A
Education (ref postsecondary education), n (%)
	Secondary or less than secondary school	12 (48)		0.74 (0.16-3.42)		.70		N/A		N/A		N/A		23 (71.9)		0.64 (0.12-3.43)			.61
	Postsecondary education	13 (52)		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		9 (28.1)		N/A			N/A

^aCuNET: condom use negotiated experiences through technology.

^bCuNET scale summarized scores were calculated for the 5 items; higher scores indicated higher support for using sexing to negotiate condom use. Due to distribution in the access to sexual and reproductive health services variable, only adjusted for 3 variables.

^cSRH: sexual and reproductive health.

^dSTI: sexually transmitted infection.

^eaOR: adjusted odds ratio.

^fStatistically significant.

^gN/A: not applicable.