TABLE 2.
Network affiliations of the features with the highest importance
Mean FC |
Degree of FC |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network name | Count | Average weight | Network name | Count | Average weight |
Default mode | 5 | 1.10 | Limbic | 9 | .11 |
Dorsal attention | 4 | 1.15 | Default mode | 3 | .10 |
Somatomotor | 3 | 1.18 | Somatomotor | 3 | .08 |
Frontoparietal control | 3 | 1.05 | Frontoparietal control | 2 | .10 |
Subcortical (hippocampus, thalamus) | 2 | 1.07 | Visual | 1 | .10 |
Visual | 2 | .97 | Subcortical (putamen) | 1 | .09 |
Limbic | 1 | .95 | Salience/ventral attention | 1 | .08 |
Note: The network distribution of the 20 features with the highest importance for epilepsy versus control classification for mean FC and degree of FC models. Count and average weight of the selected features per seven-network affiliation24 or subcortical parts are listed. Model classification weight is measured by an arbitrary unit to rank within each model’s results, but cannot be compared between models and datasets. Seven brain network affiliation is based on the Schaefer 400-parcel atlas,21 with the addition of subcortical regions from the Harvard–Oxford atlas.25
Abbreviation: FC, functional connectivity.