Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD005197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005197.pub3

Bodey 1996.

Methods RCT
 Assessor blinded
 1990‐1993
Participants Number: 407 patients (457 episodes)
 Age: med 51, range 17‐84
Interventions imipenem 500mg/m2x
 versus
 cefoperazone 2gr sulbactam 1grx3
Outcomes Clinical and microbiological failure
 Superinfection
 Adverse events
Notes USA
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Computer‐generated sequence
Allocation concealment? Low risk Patients were randomly assigned by the pharmacy and randomization was performed by the pharmacy after the patient was entered
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk The physicians caring for the patients were aware of the antibiotic regimen assigned. Evaluation was conducted by investigators not involved in the patient's care and who were blinded to the therapeutic regimen and identity of the patient.
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All‐cause mortality Unclear risk Mortality not reported
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 Treatment failure High risk 5% dropouts
Free of other bias? High risk Unit of randomization = episodes; patients to episodes ratio 0.89