Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD005197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005197.pub3

Boogaerts 1995.

Methods RCT
 Open
 1991‐1994
Participants Number: 248 patients
 Age: mean 42, range 14‐78
Interventions meropenem 1grx3
 versus
 ceftazidime 2grx3
Outcomes Overall and infection‐related mortality ‐ at end of treatment
 Clinical and microbiological failure
 Superinfection
 Drug modifications
Notes MC Europe
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Low risk Computer generated sequence
Allocation concealment? Low risk Allocation to one or the other regimen was achieved by an investigator opening the next in a sequence of sealed envelopes containing numbers generated by a computer in each center. sealed envelopes, opaque not mentioned.
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk No blinding used
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All‐cause mortality High risk 10% dropouts
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 Treatment failure High risk Number of dropouts (10%) known per study group
Free of other bias? High risk Unit of randomization = episodes; patients to episodes ratio 0.73