Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov 10;2010(11):CD005197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005197.pub3

Feld 2000.

Methods RCT
 Double‐blind
 1991‐1993
Participants Number: 411 patients (471 episodes)
 Age: mean 48.5; range 17‐85
Interventions meropenem 1grx3
 versus
 ceftazidime 2grx3
Outcomes Overall and infection‐related mortality ‐ 7 days following end of treatment
 Clinical failure
 Treatment modifications
 Superinfections
 Adverse events
Notes MC (US, Canada, Netherlands)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Adequate sequence generation? Unclear risk Patients were allocated at random for each neutropenic episode. Blinded drug was distributed based on a schedule that provided a stratified, balanced, block random assignment within each center, stratification was by the presence or absence of prophylactic treatment with antiviral medication. As patients were enrolled for specific neutropenic episodes, they were assigned  the next available number and associated randomized treatment
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk No description
Blinding? 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 All‐cause mortality High risk 2% dropouts
Incomplete outcome data addressed? 
 Treatment failure High risk Number of dropouts (13%) known per study group
Free of other bias? High risk Unit of randomization = episodes; patients to episodes ratio 0.87