Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 10;28(3):374–383. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0096

Table 3.

Provider Impressions About the Ability to Personally Connect During Teleneurology Encounters

  ABILITY TO PERSONALLY CONNECT
WORSE, n (%) SAME, n (%) BETTER, n (%)
Whole cohort 148 (9) 1,382 (86) 73 (5)
Provider experience, years
 <10 39 (6) 580 (90) 27 (4)
 10–19 27 (6) 388 (89) 23 (5)
 20–29 39 (14) 229 (84) 4 (1)
 ≥30 43 (17) 185 (75) 19 (8)
Month of encounter
 April 17 (13) 98 (78) 11 (9)
 May 70 (10) 596 (84) 41 (6)
 June 52 (8) 557 (90) 10 (2)
 July 8 (6) 112 (86) 11 (8)
 August 1 (5) 19 (95) 0 (0)
Visit typea
 New/consult 32 (9) 297 (88) 10 (3)
 Established 115 (9) 1,082 (86) 62 (5)
Division
 MS 9 (3) 247 (93) 10 (4)
 Headache 5 (5) 86 (91) 3 (3)
 Vascular 21 (13) 137 (86) 2 (1)
 Movement 34 (8) 343 (85) 27 (7)
 Cognitive 12 (11) 94 (89) 0 (0)
 General 33 (9) 303 (85) 22 (6)
 NM 24 (20) 96 (80) 0 (0)
 Epilepsy 6 (16) 30 (81) 1 (3)
 Residents 4 (8) 41 (84) 4 (8)
 Otherb 0 (0) 5 (56) 4 (44)

Numbers represent number of responses (percentage of group).

a

N = 1,598 due to missing billing code data.

b

Other includes neuro-ophthalmology and traumatic brain injury combined due to low response rate among these divisions. Established includes nonbilled visits. No. of responses per group is found in Table 3. No significant differences in the frequencies of those reporting the same or better were detected within groups for all provider or patient characteristics.