Table 5.
Multinomial Logistic Regression Models Demonstrating Latent Class Correlates of Mental and Behavioral Health Risks Among Youth Assigned Female Sex at Birth (n = 12,373)
Depressive symptomsa |
Self-perceived stressb |
Lifetime alcohol usec |
Lifetime marijuana use |
Lifetime cigarette use |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR (95% CI) | p | AOR (95% CI) | p | AOR (95% CI) | p | AOR (95% CI) | p | AOR (95% CI) | p | |
Victimization exposure class | ||||||||||
Class 1 (“No Victimization Class”; n = 6021; 48.7%) | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
Class 2 (“Sexual Harassment and SGM-based Bullying Class”; n = 4232; 34.2%) | 6.06 (4.13–8.89) | <0.001 | 1.99 (1.49–2.64) | <0.001 | 3.71 (2.74–5.01) | <0.001 | 4.50 (3.00–6.76) | <0.001 | 5.14 (3.06–8.62) | <0.001 |
Class 3 (“Poly-victimization Class”; n = 2120; 17.1%) | 8.19 (5.85–11.48) | <0.001 | 2.41 (1.89–3.07) | <0.001 | 6.70 (5.15–8.70) | <0.001 | 8.86 (6.19–12.66) | <0.001 | 9.46 (5.97–14.99) | <0.001 |
Demographic characteristics | ||||||||||
Race/ethnicity | ||||||||||
White | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
People of color | 1.08 (0.98–1.20) | 0.059 | 1.07 (0.97–1.18) | 0.102 | 0.90 (0.82–0.99) | 0.018 | 1.21 (1.08–1.35) | 0.007 | 1.02 (0.91–1.15) | 0.356 |
Sexual orientation | ||||||||||
Monosexual | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
Non-monosexual | 1.10 (1.00–1.23) | 0.046 | 1.22 (0.98–1.22) | 0.051 | 0.99 (0.89–1.09) | 0.389 | 0.82 (0.73–0.92) | <0.001 | 0.99 (0.87–1.12) | 0.425 |
Something else | 1.36 (1.15–1.62) | <0.001 | 1.21 (1.03–1.43) | 0.011 | 0.61 (0.51–0.73) | <0.001 | 0.54 (0.44–0.66) | <0.001 | 0.59 (0.48–0.74) | <0.001 |
Age, years | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.484 | 1.02 (0.98–1.05) | 0.181 | 1.46 (1.40–1.52) | <0.001 | 1.63 (1.55–1.70) | <0.001 | 1.34 (1.28–1.41) | <0.001 |
Gender identity | ||||||||||
Cisgender | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
Transgender and other gender minority | 1.57 (1.42–1.73) | <0.001 | 1.23 (1.11–1.36) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.88–1.06) | 0.245 | 1.09 (0.98–1.21) | 0.063 | 1.27 (1.14–1.43) | <0.001 |
U.S. region of residence | ||||||||||
Northeast | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
Midwest | 1.05 (0.89–1.22) | 0.277 | 0.81 (0.70–0.94) | 0.002 | 0.89 (0.77–1.03) | 0.655 | 1.12 (0.95–1.32) | 0.226 | 1.32 (1.11–1.58) | <0.001 |
South | 0.89 (0.77–1.03) | 0.058 | 0.90 (0.78–1.03) | 0.063 | 0.96 (0.84–1.10) | 0.352 | 1.06 (0.91–1.24) | 0.227 | 1.30 (1.10–1.53) | <0.001 |
West | 0.99 (0.85–1.16) | 0.456 | 0.89 (0.77–1.04) | 0.074 | 1.10 (0.95–1.27) | 0.254 | 1.27 (1.07–1.50) | 0.003 | 1.22 (1.11–1.47) | 0.015 |
SGM-specific risk variables | ||||||||||
Stigma-related stress | 1.26 (1.19–1.33) | <0.001 | 1.21 (1.15–1.27) | <0.001 | 1.02 (0.96–1.08) | 0.254 | 0.90 (0.85–0.96) | <0.001 | 0.93 (0.88–0.99) | 0.019 |
Family rejection | 1.55 (1.45–1.65) | <0.001 | 1.23 (1.16–1.30) | <0.001 | 1.25 (1.18–1.33) | <0.001 | 1.28 (1.20–1.37) | <0.001 | 1.36 (1.27–1.46) | <0.001 |
Sexual orientation disclosure to family members/parents | ||||||||||
Not disclosed sexual orientation to family members/parents | ref | ref | ref | ref | ref | |||||
Disclosed sexual orientation to at least a few family members/parents | 2.84 (2.57–3.15) | <0.001 | 1.055 (0.95–1.16) | 0.192 | 2.53 (2.30–2.78) | <0.001 | 2.91 (2.61–3.25) | <0.001 | 2.55 (2.27–2.87) | <0.001 |
SGM-specific protective variables | ||||||||||
Poly-strengthsd | ||||||||||
Thriving | 0.65 (0.62–0.68) | <0.001 | 1.23 (1.16–1.30) | <0.001 | 0.97 (0.93–1.01) | 0.052 | 0.99 (0.95–1.03) | 0.274 | 0.91 (0.87–0.95) | <0.001 |
All models adjusted for demographic characteristics and SGM-specific risk and protective variables. Significant AOR is indicated in bold. All models utilized the bias-adjusted maximum likelihood approach.
Highest tertile was used to calculate the presence of self-reported depressive symptoms.
Highest tertile was used to calculate the presence of self-perceived stress.
Highest tertile was used to calculate the presence of any alcohol use (i.e., 3 days or more).
Poly-strengths (i.e., a composite index of self-esteem, sense of mastery, sense of control, positive feelings about being LGBTQ, perception of LGBTQ-supportive family members, presence of a gay–straight alliance or similar club, perception of LGBTQ-affirmative teachers and school personnel, and access to LGBTQ-related support and resources).