Skip to main content
. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD005105. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005105.pub2

McMillan‐Price 2006.

Methods Trial design: 
 RCT 
 Randomisation procedure: Participants were stratified by weight and sex, then randomly assigned to 1 of 4 diets 
 Intention to treat: 
 Yes 
 Difference in glycaemic index of diets = 25 (intervention low glycaemic index diet 45 +/‐ 1%; comparator high GI diet: 70 +/‐ 1%)
Participants Country: 
 Australia 
 Setting: 
 Community 
 Number: 
 64 
 Age: 
 Intervention group 31.8 +/‐ 1.7 years; control group 30.5 +/‐ 1.4 years 
 Sex: 
 48 female 
 Other characteristics: 
 Body mass index of 25 or more with a body weight of less than 150 kg
Interventions Trial intervention: 
 Low glycaemic index diet. 
 Comparison intervention: 
 High glycaemic index diet. 
 12 week parallel trial of weight loss diets of defined glycaemic load
Outcomes Main outcome measures: Change in body mass, fat mass, lean mass 
 Other outcomes: 
 Change in waist circumference, total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids, plasma glucose and insulin, HOMA, leptin
Notes Source of funding: 
 Supported in part by National Heart Foundation of Australia and Meat and Livestock Australia
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear