Table 5.

Rank of the selected guide (NT2) based on each tool’s predictions

Model	Rank	Evaluation performance*
DeepCRISPR	87	Variable (SC, nDCG)
DeepSpCas9	2	Best (SC, nDCG)
DeepHF	2	Best (SC, nDCG)
Average	2	Best (SC, nDCG)
CRISPRLearner	33	Good (nDCG)
C-RNNCrispr	17	Good (nDCG)
E-CRISP	2	Stable (SC, nDCG)

* Based on the results of the comparative analysis (Figures 6–8). The corresponding metric is shown in parentheses. SC: spearman correlation, nDCG: normalized discounted cumulative gain.