Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;13:2192. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29899-w

Table 1.

Correlation between different expression levels of SET8, SNIP1 K301me1, and MARK4 with clinicopathological parameters of individuals with TNBC.

SET8 SNIP1 K301me1 MARK4
Parameters N Low (n = 55) High (n = 45) p Low (n = 48) High (n = 52) p Low (n = 61) High (n = 39) p
Age (years)a
≥56 50 26 24 0.5465 25 25 0.6889 31 19 0.8376
<56 50 29 21 23 27 30 20
Tumor sizes (cm)
≤2 17 10 7 0.8766 9 8 0.8678 13 4 0.2764
>2 + ≤5 67 37 30 32 35 40 27
>5 16 8 8 7 9 8 8
T staging
T1 + T2 81 48 33 0.0771 42 39 0.1114 52 29 0.1759
T3 + T4 19 7 12 6 13 9 10
N staging
N1 29 18 11 0.3638 19 10 0.025 25 4 0.001
N2 + N3 71 37 34 29 42 36 35
AJCC stagingb
II 26 16 10 0.436 17 9 0.0392 19 7 0.1422
III + IV 74 39 35 31 43 42 32
Pathological grading
I 10 9 1 0.0095 7 3 0.225 6 4 0.0032
II 78 43 35 37 41 53 25
III 12 3 9 4 8 2 10

aThe age of 100 individuals with TNBC ranged from 24 to 79 years old, with a median of 56 years old.

bThe clinical staging of the individuals was based on the AJCC staging (8th edition).