Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;3(2):e12727. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12727

TABLE 2.

Comparison of proportion of EMS professionals who made an adequate de‐escalation attempt by personal characteristics

Adequate De‐escalation (55%, n = 145) row % (n) Inadequate De‐escalation (45%, n = 118) row % (n) P value
Certification level <0.01
EMT 32% (9) 68% (19)
AEMT 36% (9) 64% (16)
Paramedic 59% (118) 41% (81)
Sex 0.50
Female 51% (46) 49% (44)
Male 55% (91) 45% (73)
Years of 911 EMS experience 0.06
0 to 2 46% (32) 54% (38)
2 to 10 53% (37) 47% (33)
10 to 20 58% (39) 42% (28)
20+ 62% (29) 38% (18)
Military experience 0.39
Yes 61% (19) 39% (12)
No 53% (118) 47% (104)
Law enforcement experience 0.67
Yes 58% (15) 42% (11)
No 53% (121) 47% (106)
Previous CIT training <0.01
Yes 68% (40) 32% (19)
No 50% (96) 50% (97)
Scenario 0.14
A–possible overdose 52% (49) 48% (45)
B–intoxicated person 57% (25) 43% (19)
C–aggressive family member 65% (43) 35% (23)
D–domestic violence 45% (30)  55% (36)
Felt scenario was realistic 0.30
Yes 56% (123) 44% (96)
No 48% (22) 52% (24)
Felt threatened during scenario 0.46
Yes 53% (90) 47% (80)
No 58% (57) 42% (42)

Abbreviations: AEMT, advanced emergency medical technician; CIT, crisis intervention team, EMS, emergency medical services; EMT, emergency medical technician.