Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan;45(1):158–165. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.158-165.2001

TABLE 3.

Effects of DAPD and DXG on cell proliferation and mitochondrial function and morphology in HepG2 cells

Compound Concn (μM) Cell no. (104/ml) l-Lactate density (mg/106 cells) % of mitochondrial DNA content to that for control Lipid droplet formation Mitochondrial morphology
Control 0 16.0 ± 0.9a 2.4 ± 0.2a 100 Negative Normal
DAPD 0.1 16.2 ± 0.4 2.3 ± 0.1 104 ± 10a NDb ND
DAPD 1.0 15.9 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.2 100 ± 11 ND ND
DAPD 10.0 13.2 ± 0.8 3.0 ± 0.1 92 ± 5 Negative Normal
Control 0 25.2 ± 0.8 2.35 ± 0.02 100 Negative Normal
DXG 0.1 26.1 ± 0.8 2.28 ± 0.20 106 ± 5 ND ND
DXG 1.0 25.2 ± 0.6 2.45 ± 0.08 107 ± 8 ND ND
DXG 10.0 24.9 ± 0.8 2.36 ± 0.10 99 ± 9 Negative Normal
Controlc 0 42.9 ± 0.2 1.52 ± 0.04 100 ND ND
DAPDc 25.0 ND ND 64 ± 4 ND ND
DAPD 50.0 45.7 ± 0.1 1.40 ± 0.13 36 ± 6 ND ND
DXGc 25.0 ND ND 103 ± 11 ND ND
DXG 50.0 45.5 ± 0.2 1.62 ± 0.06 98 ± 3 ND ND
a

Data are the means ± standard deviations of three measurements. 

b

ND, not determined. 

c

The second experiment was performed with higher concentrations of DAPD and DXG.