Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;23:319. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08541-5

Table 2.

Comparison of the genome coverage and assigned clade for run116 samples on Nextclade

Coverage (%) Clade
Sample GridION MiSeq GridION MiSeq
K013400 72 92 20C 20A
K013408 57 86 20H (Beta, V2) 20C
K013410 70 90 20C 20A
K013411 76 93 20H (Beta, V2) 20A
K013415 63 91 20C 20A
K013417 63 94 20C 20A
K013418 62 94 20C 20A
K013423 63 91 20C 20A
K013425 60 93 20C 20A
K013426 57 89 20C 20A
K013429 64 95 20H (Beta, V2) 20C
K013432 65 93 20C 20A
K013433 50 94 20C 20A
K013434 68 94 20C 20A
K013437 35 92 20H (Beta, V2) 20C
K013445 65 91 20C 20A
K013447 92 98 20A 20D
K013449 49 94 20C 20A
K013450 68 97 20C 20A
K013452 68 94 20C 20A
K013454 56 90 20C 20A
K013462 51 92 20C 20A
K013465 60 94 20C 20A
K013467 50 92 20C 20A
K013470 72 89 20C 20H (Beta, V2)
K013476 69 91 20C 20H (Beta, V2)
Total 20A 1 20
20C 22 3
20D 0 1
20H (Beta, V2) 4 3

The table above highlights the 27 samples which were sequenced on both the MiSeq and the GridION but were classified in different clades by Nexclade. Clades identified by the GridION include 20A (n = 1), 20C (n = 22), and 20H (Beta, V2) (n = 4). Clades identified by the MiSeq include 20A (n = 20), 20C (n = 3), 20D (n = 1), and 20H (Beta, V2) (n = 3). There was also an overall higher genomic coverage for sequences from the MiSeq when compared to the GridION.