Table 1.
Author (year of publication) | Lizak (2021) [24] | Pfeuffer (2021) [22] | Giovannoni (2021) [26] | Yamout (2020) [28] | Moccia (2020) [27] | Patti (2020) [25] | Leist (2014) [4] | Giovannoni (2010) [5] | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study design | Observ. registry | Observ. prosp. | Long-term extension | Long-term extension | Long-term extension | Long-term extension | RCT | RCT | |
Demographics | n = | 90 | 270 | 98 | 22 | 13 | 80 | 206 | 433 |
Female (%) | 72 | 61 | 68 | – | 69 | 58 | 63 | 69 | |
Age (mean ± SD) | 47 ± 12 | 39 | 38 ± 11 | – | 39 ± 7 | 39 ± 10 | 32 ± 9 | 38 ± 10 | |
RRMS (%) | 78 | 100 | – | – | – | 75 | 35 | 100 | |
BL EDSS (median) | 5.25 | 2.0 | 3.0 | – | 3.5 | – | 1.5 | Mean: 2.8 | |
Median follow-up (months) | 42 | 25 | 60 | 118 | 98 | 73 | 24 | 24 | |
Efficacy | Relapse free at 24 months (%) | 65 | – | – | – | – | 85 | – | 80 |
Relapse free at EOS (%) | – | 74 | – | – | 54 | 57 | – | 80 | |
Free of disability prog. at 24 months (%) | 80 | – | – | – | – | 97 | – | 86 | |
Free of disability prog. at EOS (%) | – | 76 | 75 | 86 | 39 | 64 | – | 86 | |
Therap. switched at EOS (%) | 69 | – | – | 59 | 69 | 68 | – | – | |
Time to next DMT (median, years) | 1.7 | – | – | – | – | 3.8 | – | – | |
Time to first relapse (months) | – | 9 | – | – | – | – | – | 13 | |
ARR after CLAD | 0.3 | – | – | 0.2 | 0.17 | 0.19 | – | 0.14 | |
ARR before CLAD | 1.8 | 1.0 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Observ. observational, prosp. prospective, RCT randomized controlled trial, n number of patients included, SD standard deviation, RRMS relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, BL baseline, EDSS Expanded Disability Status Scale, EOS end of study, DMT disease-modifying therapy, CLAD cladribine, ARR annualized relapse rate, prog. progression, NEDA no evidence of disease activity, IFN interferon, GA glatiramer acetate, DMF dimethyl fumarate, FTY fingolimod, NAT natalizumab, ALEM alemtuzumab