Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;20(6):2825–3069. doi: 10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4

Fig. 102.

Fig. 102

Options for risk mitigation schemes to mitigate a felt shaking causing nuisance, b non-structural damage incurring repair costs, and c structural damage that could pose a threat to the building occupants (Bommer et al. 2015a); the range of relative costs associated with each alternative are indicated ($: low; $$: medium: $$$: high), noting that abandoning a project that is operational is much higher than abandonment following a feasibility assessment