Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan;45(1):212–216. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.212-216.2001

TABLE 3.

Distribution of MICs (μg/ml) of 11 antimicrobial agents by geographic area

Antimicrobial India (n = 168)
Jamaica (n = 41)
Mexico (n = 38)
Kenya (n = 37)
MIC50a MIC90b MIC50 MIC90 MIC50 MIC90 MIC50 MIC90
AMP 8 >1,024 4 1,024 4 >1,024 4 32
DOX 16 64 4 16 32 64 32 128
NAL 4 256 4 8 4 4 8 16
TMP 256 1,024 16 1,024 256 512 128 1,024
SXT 512 >1,024 8 32 8 >1,024 64 256
CROc ≤0.0156 0.0625 ≤0.0156 0.0625 ≤0.0156 0.0625 ≤0.0156 4
MEC 0.5 16 0.125 8 0.125 8 0.5 4
CIP ≤0.0156 0.25 ≤0.0156 0.0312 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 0.0312
LVX 0.0625 1 0.0625 0.25 0.0625 0.0625 ≤0.0156 0.25
AZMc ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 ≤0.0156 0.5 2
RFX 16 32 16 32 16 32 16 256
a

MIC50, MIC required to inhibit the growth of 50% of the strains tested. 

b

MIC90, MIC required to inhibit the growth of 90% of the strains tested. 

c

Data for CRO and AZM are based on 268 pathogens. Sixteen isolates (non-cholera causing vibrios, P. shigelloides, and Aeromonas spp.) from India were not included in this part of the study.