Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;22:137. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02173-7

Table 4.

Various anxiety management techniques and total MDAS scores

Anxiety management technique used (n) Pre-treatment MDAS Post-treatment MDAS Mean difference P value**
Mean (SD) 95% CI Mean (SD) 95% CI
Single technique used
Referral to specialist, recall, counselling (n = 21) 9.52 (4.3) 7.7–11.4 8.54 (4.2) 6.7–10.3 0.98 0.457
Distraction only technique (n = 15) 10.25 (3.8) 8.3–12.2 7.69 (2.68) 6.3–9 2.56 0.0416*
Positive reinforcement only technique (n = 49) 10.12 (4.3) 8.9–11.3 8.00 (3.08) 7.1–8.8 2.12 0.0062*
Control only technique (n = 57) 10.67 (4.6) 9.5–11.9 8.91 (3.95) 7.9–9.9 1.76 0.0309*
Systematic desensitization only technique (n = 10) 11.60 (3.14) 9.6–13.5 9.30 (4.19) 6.7–11.9 2.30 0.007*
Rest and breaks during the procedure only (n = 39) 10.25 (4.09) 8.9–11.5 8.23 (3.51) 7.1–9.3 2.02 0.0219*
Short appointment and only emergency procedure undertaken (n = 7) 10.71 (5.31) 6.8–14.6 10 (5.23) 6.1–13.9 0.71 0.805
Few combination techniques are presented below
Distraction, positive reinforcement, Short appointment with rest and breaks (n = 2) 12 (3.41) 7.3–16.7 11.67 (4.32) 5.7–17.7 0.33 NA
Positive reinforcement, control, systematic desensitization, rest and break, short appointment (n = 2) 9.10 (5.5) 1.5–16.7 7.60 (4.72) 1.1–14.1 1.50 NA
Positive reinforcement and control (n = 12) 9.33 (1.53) 8.5–10.2 7.67 (3.06) 5.94–9.4 1.73 0.106
Distraction, positive reinforcement, systematic desensitization, control (irrespective of length of the appointment and rest and breaks)(n = 9) 10.13 (4.02) 7.5–12.8 10 (4.84) 6.8–13.2 0.13 0.951
Significance of rest and breaks and short appointment time
Short appointments (irrespective of the technique used for anxiety management) (n = 31) 9.19 (3.7) 7.9–10.5 8.0 (3.89) 6.6–9.37 1.19 0.222
Rest and breaks (irrespective of the technique) (n = 149) 9.08 (3.12) 8.6–9.6 7.42 (2.5) 7–7.8 1.66 0.001*
Rest and breaks, and short appointments (irrespective of the technique) (n = 13) 10.92 (3.4) 9.1–12.8 9.08 (3.59) 7.1–11 1.84 0.192

CI, confidence intervals; NA, not assessable

*P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant

**Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for non-parametric data. For parametric data, paired t test was used