Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 21;22:200. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02281-2

Table 2.

Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis and cox regression analysis for building the model

Variable Univariate analysis P Multivariate anlaysis Selected factors for building model
Hazard ratio 95% CI P Hazard ratio 95% CI P
Age, years  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001
  ≥ 70 Reference Reference
  < 70 1.733 1.536–1.956  < 0.001 1.745 1.547–1.968  < 0.001
Tumor histology  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001
 Papillary histology Reference Reference
 Adenocarcinoma and others histology 1.667 1.236–2.248  < 0.001 1.684 1.251–2.266  < 0.001
 Squamous histology 2.111 1.410–3.161  < 0.001 2.282 1.536–3.390  < 0.001
Tumor grade  < 0.001 0.469
 I Reference
 II 0.997 0.814–1.221 0.975
 III 1.103 0.895–1.360 0.358
 IV 1.103 0.759–1.603 0.607
Tumor size, cm  < 0.001 0.156
  < 3 Reference
 3–5 1.116 0.968–1.287 0.131
 5–10 1.133 0.965–1.331 0.127
  ≥ 10 1.343 0.989–1.825 0.059
Pathologic T category  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001
 T1 Reference Reference
 T2 0.994 0.783–1.263 0.963 1.003 0.790–1.273 0.982
 T3 1.960 1.530–2.510  < 0.001 2.064 1.619–2.632  < 0.001
 T4 2.244 1.570–3.206  < 0.001 2.384 1.682–3.381  < 0.001
Pathologic N category  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001
 N0 Reference Reference
 N1 2.024 1.770–2.316  < 0.001 2.076 1.818–2.370
 N2 2.026 1.557–2.637  < 0.001 2.086 1.606–2.709
Pathologic M category  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001
 M0 Reference Reference
 M1 2.242 1.915–2.626  < 0.001 2.300 1.969–2.687  < 0.001
Sex 0.083
 Male
 Female
Resection type 0.062
 Radical resection
 Palliative resection
Tumor number  < 0.001*
 Single tumor
 Multiple tumors

*The tumor number was excluded in the multivariable analysis, since its hazard ratio was less than 1, which was contrary to the factor that patients with more tumors had worse survival outcome