Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2021 Mar 24;66(7):10.1088/1361-6560/abe9f6. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe9f6

Table 4.

Comparison between the relative errors (REs) and target registration errors (TREs) for images and deformation vector fields (DVFs) solved by 2D3D-RegNet, using different offset angles at test time. Four scan angle scenarios were included in this evaluation: single-view 30°, ortho-view 30°, single-view 90° and ortho-view 90° (Fig. 3). The networks were separately trained on the four scan angle scenarios, with angle directions specified in Fig. 3. During testing, the scan angles were collectively offset by magnitudes ranging from 0° to 25°.

off 0° off 5° off 10° off 15° off 20° off 25°
30° (Single-view) RE/% 17.7 ± 2.8 17.7 ± 2.8 18.0 ± 2.8 18.4 ± 2.9 18.8 ± 2.9 19.4 ± 3.0
TRE/mm 4.6 ± 3.5 4.6 ± 3.5 4.7 ± 3.6 4.8 ± 3.8 5.0 ± 3.9 5.2 ± 4.1
30° (Ortho-view, 15° each) RE/% 15.4 ± 2.5 15.6 ± 2.4 15.9 ± 2.5 16.2 ± 2.5 16.8 ± 2.6 17.2 ± 2.6
TRE/mm 4.5 ± 3.4 4.5 ± 3.4 4.6 ± 3.5 4.6 ± 3.6 4.7 ± 3.7 4.8 ± 3.8
90° (Single-view) RE/% 15.3 ± 2.4 15.4 ± 2.4 15.7 ± 2.4 16.0 ± 2.4 16.3 ± 2.5 16.6 ± 2.5
TRE/mm 4.3 ± 3.3 4.3 ± 3.4 4.4 ± 3.4 4.5 ± 3.5 4.6 ± 3.6 4.7 ± 3.8
90° (Ortho-view, 45° each) RE/% 14.4 ± 2.1 14.3 ± 2.1 14.4 ± 2.1 14.5 ± 2.2 14.8 ± 2.2 15.2 ± 2.3
TRE/mm 3.9 ± 3.0 3.9 ± 3.0 4.0 ± 3.0 4.0 ± 3.1 4.0 ± 3.1 4.1 ± 3.1