Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;12(4):454. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040454

Table 1.

Comparison between AAFO and PAFO.

Parameter Before AFO After AFO D p p
PROM of ankle DF (d)
AAFO 3.00 ± 3.50 5.50 ± 3.70 2.50 ± 2.64 0.015 * 0.990
PAFO 3.00 ± 3.50 5.50 ± 3.69 2.50 ± 2.64 0.015 *
MAS of GM
AAFO 1.65 ± 0.24 1.30 ± 0.26 −0.35 ± 0.24 0.001 * 0.343
PAFO 1.65 ± 0.24 1.35 ± 0.34 −0.30 ± 0.26 0.005 *
Walking velocity (m/s)
AAFO 0.26 ± 0.21 0.28 ± 0.20 0.016 ± 0.017 0.015 * 0.021 **
PAFO 0.26 ± 0.21 0.27 ± 0.19 0.008 ± 0.025 0.343
Stretch reflex RMS of GM (µV)
AAFO 45.70 ± 33.59 37.60 ± 30.24 −8.10 ± 7.99 0.011 * 0.017 **
PAFO 51.20 ± 49.11 46.90 ± 46.59 −4.30 ± 5.33 0.311
Walking RMS of GM (µV)
AAFO 209.90 ± 233.87 146.80 ± 184.12 −62.50 ± 78.09 0.015 * 0.015 **
PAFO 197.60 ± 206.30 301.30 ± 298.72 103.70 ± 129.36 0.032 *

Abbreviations: AFO, ankle foot orthosis; D, difference of mean data; PROM, passive range of motion; DF, dorsiflexion; d, degree; AAFO, anterior ankle foot orthosis; PAFO, posterior ankle foot orthosis; MAS, Modified Ashworth Scale; RMS, root mean square; GM, gastrocnemius muscle; * Mean difference comparisons within each group were performed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the level of significance was p < 0.05. ** Mean difference comparisons between the AAFO and PAFO were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test and the level of significance was p < 0.05.