Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 18;23(8):4454. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084454

Table 1.

Comparison of CRISPER/Cas9 with ZFN and TALEN.

Editing Technology DNA Binding Determinant Endonuclease Target Length (bp) Off Targeting Intended Effects Unintended Effects
CRISPR/Cas9 crRNA/sgRNA Cas9 18–21 Variable Highly specific, highly efficient, and multiple targeting sites Target selection limited by the requirement for PAM sequences; Off-target effects
ZFN Zinc finger protein, FokI1018 FokI 18–36 High Any genomic sequence targeted; Fewer off-target effects Low efficiency; Targets only a single site at one time
TALENs Transcription-activator like effector FokI 30–40 Low Targets any genomic sequence; Off-target
effects are limited
Comparatively low inefficiency; Targets only a single site at one time; Sensitive to target DNA methylation