Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):1069. doi: 10.3390/plants11081069

Table 5.

Linear correlations in the E6203×LA1589 population among (A) FLN (flower number), (B) FRN (fruit number) and (C) FRS (fruit set) for different experimental years (2018 and 2019) and temperature regimes (T1: 25 °C day/20 °C night; T2: 30 °C day/25 °C night; T3: 35 °C day/30 °C night). Note: ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05. Significant correlations within years are highlighted in grey and correlations between years are framed in orange.

(A) 18FLN_T1 18FLN_T2 18FLN_T3 19FLN_T1 19FLN_T2
18FLN_T2 0.32 **
18FLN_T3 0.42 ** 0.57 **
19FLN_T1 0.39 ** 0.22 0.32 **
19FLN_T2 0.23 * 0.34 ** 0.28 * 0.51 **
19FLN_T3 0.22 0.24 * 0.31 ** 0.36 ** 0.32 **
(B) 18FRN_T1 18FRN_T2 18FRN_T3 19FRN_T1 19FRN_T2
18FRN_T2 0.16
18FRN_T3 0.07 0.33 **
19FRN_T1 0.53 ** 0.15 0.12
19FRN_T2 0.34 ** 0.31 ** 0.23 * 0.52 **
19FRN_T3 0.18 0.13 −0.04 0.25 * 0.23 **
(C) 18FRS_T1 18FRS_T2 18FRS_T3 19FRS_T1 19FRS_T2
18FRS_T2 0.06
18FRS_T3 0.02 0.18
19FRS_T1 0.18 0.06 −0.06
19FRS_T2 0.17 0.09 0.27 * 0.29 **
19FRS_T3 0.09 0.12 −0.01 0.01 0.07