Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;14(4):717. doi: 10.3390/v14040717

Table 1.

Comparison of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and biolayer interferometry (BLI) to other common binding assays.

Assay Method Overview Advantages Limitations
SPR [19] Binding measured with one immobilized partner and one partner in flow chamber by reflection of light. Label-free, real-time kinetic Regeneration optimization [16,24]
Non-specific binding
One immobilized partner
BLI Binding measured with one partner immobilized and one diluted partner in plate well by reflection of light. Label-free, real-time kinetic Sample evaporation over time [25]
Agitation required to prevent re-binding [25]
One immobilized partner
Regeneration optimization
Non-specific binding
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Binding measured as surface adsorption between both binding partners by chemical colorimetric signal [19]. Label-free Not real-time
Several buffers
Plate-based immobilization
Signal based on secondary antibody [19]
Non-specific binding
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) [20] Binding measured in solution by enthalpy changes from binding event. Label-free, real-time kinetic High sensitivity to matrix changes and non-specific enthalpic events
Flow Cytometry [26,27] Binding measured between two suspended partners using fluorescence and light scattering. Supports cell-based assays Not real-time
Fluorescent labeling required