Table 1.
Pairwise correlations between gut microbiota and metabolic markers, IL 6 gene, PPARα gene.
| Groups | Genus | Metabolic Marker/Gene | Correlation, r | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFD vs. HFD + 5 GE | Clostridium sensu stricto 13 | HOMA IR | −0.76 | 4.10 × 10−3 |
| FI | −0.743 | 5.70 × 10−3 | ||
| IL 6 gene (rWAT) | 0.583 | 0.046 | ||
| Candidatus Saccharimonas | IL 6 gene (rWAT) | −0.633 | 0.027 | |
| HFD vs. HFD + 50 GE | Christensenellaceae R 7 group | PPARα gene (L) | −0.651 | 0.022 |
| FI | 0.581 | 0.047 | ||
| IL 6 gene (rWAT) | −0.639 | 0.025 | ||
| NK4A214 group | PPARα gene (L) | −0.613 | 0.034 | |
| FI | 0.62 | 0.032 | ||
| IL 6 gene (rWAT) | −0.674 | 0.016 | ||
| HFD vs. HFD + GEE | Clostridia UCG 014 | Leptin | 0.636 | 0.026 |
| TG | 0.727 | 7.40 × 10−3 | ||
| Ruminococcus | FI | 0.685 | 0.014 | |
| Leptin | 0.594 | 0.042 | ||
| TG | 0.615 | 0.033 |
Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA IR), geraniin (GE), geraniin-enriched extract (GEE), fasting insulin (FI), interleukin 6 (IL 6), retroperitoneal white adipose tissues (rWAT), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), triacylglyceride (TG).