Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;12(4):242. doi: 10.3390/bios12040242

Table 2.

Existing Dexamethasone Determination Method Comparison Chart.

Method Linear Range LOD Applications Recovery Ref.
Electrochemical aptasensor 2.5–100 nM 2.12 nM tab water and drinking water 81.5–103.2% [19]
Immunochromatography Milk: 0.3 ng/mL
pork: 0.7 μg/kg
milk and pork 80.0–122.8% [24]
Electrochemical aptasensor 10–500 μg/mL 3.59 μg/mL herbal medicine samples - [25]
HPLC water = 6 ng/mL
Feed = 190 ng/g
water and feed for meat-producing animals 99.4 ± 1.3% [26]
Electrochemical sensor 0.05 to 30 mM 3.0 nM human urine and serum samples 97.0–102.0% [27]
HPLC 10 ng/mL human plasma 96.96–106.07% [28]
Hanging mercury drop electrode 25.5–122.3 µM 7.6 µM drug sample 99.8–100% [29]
Square-wave adsorptive voltammetry 0.0498–0.61 µM 2.54 nM eye drops, injectable, elixir 94.14–112.41% [30]
Colorimetric biosensor 0.1–9 ng/mL 2.0 μg/kg food supplements and cosmetic samples [31]
Colorimetric biosensor 10–350 nmol/mL 0.5 nmol/mL milk and glucosamine 93.6–117% this assay