Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;12(4):536. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040536

Table 3.

Comparison of complications between transvenous ICD and subcutaneous ICD.

Transvenous ICD Subcutaneous ICD
Number of patients 330 7
Patients with complications 97 (29.4%) 4 (57.1%)
Number of complications 234 10
Inappropriate shocks
Cause of shock, n (%)
152 (65%) 10 (100%)
-Supraventricular arrhythmias 65 (42.8%) 0 (0%)
-R-wave oversensing 0 (0%) 1 (10%)
-T-wave oversensing 1 (0.7%) 6 (60%)
-Sinus tachycardia 4 (3%) 0 (0%)
--Electrode defect 1 (0.7%) 1 (10%)
-Lead fracture/failure 9 (6%) 0 (0%)
Electrode defect 1 (0.4%) 0 (0%)
Lead fracture/failure 26 (11.1%) 0 (0%)
Electrical storm 46 (19.7%) 0 (0%)
Thromboembolic event 1 (0.4%) 0 (0%)
Endocarditis 2 (0.8%) 0 (0%)
ICD-pocket infection 6 (2.6%) 0 (0%)
Follow-up time 46.8 months, mean (excluding studies reporting the median follow-up) 28.5 months mean
21 months median
(range 16–80 months)