Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;11(4):742. doi: 10.3390/antiox11040742

Table 3.

Examples of the most common incorporation methods of bioactive ingredients within the edible food matrix and coatings.

Incorporation Method within Edible Matrix Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Emulsions and nanoemulsions
  • -

    The possibility of incorporation of polar, non-polar, and amphiphilic compounds into the same delivery system

  • -

    Different rheological ranges (from viscous liquids to plastic)

  • -

    Direct use in “wet” state or drying to powders

  • -

    Emulsions can be made entirely from food-grade ingredients (such as water, oil, surfactants, phospholipids, proteins, and polysaccharides)

  • -

    Easy processing (mixing and homogenising)

  • -

    Susceptible to physical instability

  • -

    Limited protection and controlled release due to small droplet size

  • -

    Limited number of emulsifiers

[114]
Liposomes
  • -

    High bioavailability and absorption compared to other oral forms of supplementation

  • -

    Increased intracellular delivery

  • -

    Ability to deliver both hydrophilic and hydrophobic compounds simultaneously

  • -

    Cost effective due to high bioavailability

  • -

    High industrial cost and scale-up problems

  • -

    Poor stability under the complex environmental conditions

  • -

    Potential difficulties in finding suitable food-grade substances

  • -

    Manufacturing-related issues such as non-reproducibility from batch to batch, lack of effective sterilization methods

[115,116,117]
Solid lipid nanoparticles
  • -

    Increased stability and prolonged release

  • -

    Slowing down the diffusion of pro-oxidants

  • -

    Improvement of bioavailability

  • -

    Limited loading capacity for hydrophilic compounds

  • -

    Gelation of lipid dispersions

[118]
Nanofibers
  • -

    Non-mechanical engineering → structural advantages: ultrafine structures, high porosity, high surface-to-volume ratio, tailored morphology

  • -

    Nanofibrils can adsorb at the oil/water interface and form a coating around the oil droplets

  • -

    Prolonged release time of the active ingredients

  • -

    Non-thermal approach/protection against thermal degradation and possibility of encapsulation of thermosensitive compounds

  • -

    High efficiency of incorporated bioactives

  • -

    Reduced amount of organic solvents

  • -

    Sustainability and environmentally-friendly

  • -

    Low productivity

  • -

    So far, no data available on the long-term stability of compounds produced

  • -

    Electrospinning is currently only used on a laboratory scale

  • -

    Potential environmental and health risks of nanocomponents still quite unexplored

[102,119]
Inclusion complex
  • -

    Protection of lipophilic food ingredients from oxidation and degradation by light, heat

  • -

    Improved thermal stability

  • -

    Improved bioaccessibility

  • -

    Improved water solubility of hydrophobic compounds

  • -

    Ability to mask the bad taste of certain substances → reduction of organoleptic effects of volatile compounds

  • -

    RH controlled release

  • -

    For polymers used in the food industry, the durability has not been studied so far

  • -

    Polymer preparation usually does not follow the concept of green chemistry and new preparation methods should be developed

[120]
Complex coacervates
  • -

    Higher thermal degradation temperatures than their individual biopolymers

  • -

    High payload

  • -

    Process at low temperature

  • -

    Reduced evaporation losses

  • -

    Compatibility to control the release of active ingredients

  • -

    Improvement of chemical stability of sensitive compounds

  • -

    The high cost of the particle isolation processe and the complexity of the technique should be considered

[121,122,123]