Table 5.
Effect of dietary Ca level on tibia bone parameters of 42-d-old broilers1
Dietary Ca, % | Ash percentage, % | Ash Ca percentage, % | Ash P percentage, % | BMC, g | BMD, g/cm2 | Bone strength, N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.50 | 52.0 | 35.6b | 17.8a | 3.01b | 0.261b | 241 |
0.60 | 52.3 | 36.2ab | 17.9a | 3.65a | 0.283a | 303 |
0.70 | 52.4 | 36.4a | 17.8a | 3.76a | 0.292a | 322 |
0.80 | 52.8 | 36.1a | 17.9a | 3.70a | 0.295a | 321 |
0.90 | 52.8 | 35.8ab | 16.7b | 3.30a | 0.287a | 278 |
1.00 | 53.3 | 36.2a | 17.7ab | 3.66a | 0.289a | 326 |
1.10 | 52.1 | 36.3a | 17.0bc | 3.69a | 0.292a | 345 |
SEM | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.127 | 0.0058 | 17.7 |
P-value | ||||||
Ca level | 0.069 | 0.011 | 0.0006 | 0.0004 | 0.005 | 0.14 |
Linear | — | 0.032 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.002 | — |
Quadratic | — | 0.20 | 0.78 | 0.002 | 0.007 | — |
Data represent the means of 6 replicates (n = 6).
Values with different superscript letter within a column differ (P < 0.05).
BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density.