Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 2;12(4):568. doi: 10.3390/jpm12040568

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of the clusters.

Monitoring Status Group Post-Hoc Comparison
Variable Overall
(n = 35 1)
LA
(n = 6 1)
MA
(n = 7 1)
HA
(n = 22 1)
p-Value 2
(Anova)
HA-LA LA-MA HA-MA
Sex 0.2
Female 23/35 (66%) 2/6 (33%) 6/7 (86%) 15/22 (68%)
Male 12/35 (34%) 4/6 (67%) 1/7 (14%) 7/22 (32%)
Age 37 ± 12 37 ± 6 29 ± 6 39 ± 14 0.10
Duration of the study [d] 160 ± 53 157 ± 58 140 ± 50 168 ± 54 0.3
Average Daily Steps 8320 ± 2648 7172 ± 3379 8928 ± 2821 8440 ± 2418 0.4
Starting BMI 24.6 ± 3.8 24.02 ± 3.1 23.7 ± 3.9 25.2 ± 4.0 0.5
BMI variation −0.4 ± 1.1 0.6 ± 0.7 −0.6 ± 1.3 −0.6 ± 0.9 0.050 0.007 (**) 0.07 0.96
Weight Frequency Monitoring (WFM) 0.66 ± 0.27 0.37 ± 0.24 0.6 ± 0.09 0.83 ± 0.12 <0.001 0.004 (**) 0.97 <0.001 (***)
Food Frequency Monitoring (FFM) 0.70 ± 0.24 0.28 ± 0.07 0.70 ± 0.16 0.81 ± 0.15 <0.001 <0.001 (***) <0.001 (***) 0.14

1 Mean ± SD or Frequency (%); 2 Fisher’s exact test; Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test. Statistically significant differences are reported in bold. (**) stands for p-value < 0.01; (***) stands for p-value < 0.001.