Table 2.
Summary of MS techniques—separation-coupled and NMR coupled.
Technique | Employment | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|
GC-MS | Detection and quantification of a wide range of metabolites (volatiles and non-volatiles) without modifications. | High resolution, fit for complex biological samples. | Not effective on thermolabile compounds. Difficulties with the identification of unknown compounds. |
LC-MS | Detection and quantification of strongly to slightly polar metabolites. | High sensitivity, good resolution, effective on thermolabile compounds. | Need to reduce volatility and to reduce the potential loss of metabolites. |
CE-MS | Detection and quantification of polar metabolites with small sample volumes. | Small volumes with high resolutions. | Complexity when identifying compounds and buffer incompatibility. |
NMR-MS | Detection and quantification of monomolecular organic compounds in a large, broad spectrum, using 1H, 13C, and 31P (naturally abundant in biological samples). | Feasible in a wide range of processes for qualitative and quantitative evaluation through a non-biased, fast, and reusable technique. | Cost, and low sensitivity for metabolite detection. |