Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;12(4):429. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12040429

Table 2.

Details on EEG Connectivity data and behavioral data. Cells report median and (IQR25—IQR75) of post- and pre-differences of EEG data (each band and region for each condition; for example, alpha frontal median for sham condition was −0.08 and IQR25 −0.12, IQR75 0.01) and behavioral data (CRS-R total scores and modified index for each condition. For example, the median of CRS-R total scores for sham condition was −0.5 and IQR25 −1, IQR75 1.25). The last column reports the Chi-squared and p-value (between parentheses) for the Kruskal–Wallis comparing that band and region between conditions for the EEG data and the Chi-squared and p-value for the Kruskal–Wallis between conditions for behavioral data.

Sham tDCS tPCS Chi-Squared (p-Value)
Alpha frontal −0.08
(−0.12; 0.01)
0.10
(−0.016; 0.15)
0.02
(−01; 0.09)
4.90
(0.08)
Alpha parietal 0.000
(−0.02; 0.06)
0.045
(0.001; 0.12)
0.011
(−0.04; 0.13)
0.673
(0.71)
Theta frontal −0.037
(−0.09; 0.09)
0.142
(−0.05; 0.19)
−0.122
(−0.20; 0.01)
5.697
(0.05)
Theta parietal −0.12
(−0.20; 0.00)
−0.04
(−0.19; 0.03)
−0.01
(−0.09; 0.00)
0.08
(0.64)
CRS-R total score −0.5
(−1; 1.25)
1
(−0.5; 1.5)
0
(−0.25; 0.25)
1.47
(0.49)
CRS-R modified index −1.04
(−2.09; 1.47)
4.52
(−0.26; 10.42)
0
(−6.93; 0)
4.11
(0.13)