Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):1125. doi: 10.3390/foods11081125

Table 2.

Analysis of variance describing the effect of the different fermentation variables on the response variables (TPC, DMBQ, and DPPH) as linear, quadratic, and interactive terms and the coefficients for the predicted models.

Source DF TPC DMBQ DPPH
Coefficient Sum of Squares p-Value Coefficient Sum of Squares p-Value Coefficient Sum of Squares p-Value
Model 8 3.29 8.39 <0.0001 ** 0.42 0.73 <0.0001 ** 84.75 2439.02 <0.0001 **
X1 1 - 0.004 0.9418 ns - 0.001 0.6351 ns −2.35 66.40 0.0107 *
X2 1 0.22 0.61 0.0109 * 0.052 0.032 0.0435 * 8.91 951.83 <0.0001 **
X3 1 - 0.029 0.5402 ns 0.081 0.17 0.0003 ** 1.74 78.34 0.0063 **
X1X2 1 - 0.006 0.7694 ns - 0.002 0.9957 ns - 0.15 0.8927 ns
X1X3 1 - 0.075 0.3291 ns - 0.009 0.3014 ns 3.36 135.37 0.0008 **
X2X3 1 - 0.015 0.6625 ns - 0.007 0.3533 ns - 0.002 0.9869 ns
X12 1 −0.75 3.07 <0.0001 ** −0.13 0.098 0.0030 ** −11.88 779.06 <0.0001 **
X22 1 −0.56 1.72 0.0002 ** −0.20 0.22 <0.0001 ** −3.61 72.12 0.0083 **
Residual 17 1.27 0.14 137.34
Lack of Fit 9 0.23 0.9874 ns 0.11 0.0725 ns 89.04 0.2490 ns
Pure Error 8 1.04 0.029 48.30
Total 25 9.66 0.87 2576.36
R2 0.8689 0.8390 0.9467
Adj. R2 0.8072 0.8128 0.9216
CV (%) 8.15 8.98 3.66
Adequate precision 10.79 10.091 23.162

** Highly significant (p < 0.01), * significant (p < 0.05) and ns for not significant.