Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet. 2018 Sep 27;62(1):1037–1041. doi: 10.1177/1541931218621239

Table 1.

Average (min, max) Ratings of Importance for Interface Design Features (1 = Not important at all, 5 = Very important)

Feature Therapists Individuals with Stroke
Single task completion time 3 (2, 4) 4.7 (4, 5)
User’s smoothness (quality of movement) 4.3 (4, 5) 4 (2, 5)
Number of completed exercises 3.7 (3, 4) 3.7 (2, 5)
Selection of exercises to complete 3.7 (3, 4) 4.7 (4, 5)
Display of object position/trajectory 4.7 (4, 5) 4 (2, 5)
Ability to set and track progress toward goals 5 4.7 (4, 5)
Display of user history showing trends over week 4.7 (4, 5) 4 (2, 5)
Display of user history showing trends over month 4 (3, 5) 4 (2, 5)
Rewards for meeting goals 3 (2, 4) 3.3 (2, 4)
Share information with peers 2.7 (2, 3) 2.7 (2, 3)
Share information with caretakers 3.7 (3, 4) 2.3 (2, 3)
Share information with therapists 4.7 (4, 5) 4.3 (4, 5)
Automatic notifications or alerts 4.3 (4, 5) 3 (2, 4)