Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 15;2022:1116535. doi: 10.1155/2022/1116535

Table 2.

Association between STAT3 expression and clinical features of thyroid cancer patients in meta-analysis.

Factors Studies (n) Analytical model OR (95%CI) P value Heterogeneity
I 2 P h
Age (<45 vs ≥ 45) 4 REM 0.54 (0.21, 1.36) 0.191 64.00 0.039
Sex (male vs female) 4 FEM 0.88 (0.54, 1.44) 0.609 0 0.898
Tumor size (≤1 cm vs. > 1 cm) 2 FEM 0.13 (0.05, 0.33) <0.001 0 0.743
Tumor metastasis (yes vs. no) 6 REM 2.83 (1.08, 7.46) 0.035 80.70 <0.001
Capsular invasion (yes vs. no) 2 REM 2.98 (0.23, 38.29) 0.403 89.60 0.002
TNM stage (I-II vs. III-IV) 3 REM 0.40 (0.24, 0.67) <0.001 82.10 0.004
Tumor multiplicity (single vs. multiplicity) 2 REM 0.25 (0.003, 19.28) 0.533 86.00 0.008

P values were obtained by using the “METAN” program in Stata 14.0; P value 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. FEM, fixed-effects model; REM, random-effects model; TNM, tumor node metastasis; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Bold fonts indicate statistical differences.