Comparative photocatalytic performance of MoS₂/NiS₂ with other similar photocatalysts.

Material	Morphology	Dye concentration (mg L−1)	Light source	Dye	Degradation (%)	Time taken (min)	Ref.
MoS2	Porous microspheres	10	100 W xenon lamp	MB	89.2	150	38
MoS2–TiO2	Nanoparticles and nanocrystals	5	UV lamp	MB	61	100	14
ZnO/V2O5	Nanoparticles	10	—	MB	83	150	41
MoS2/C3N4	Nano sheets	5	300 W xenon lamp	MO and RhB	—	—	42
Fe/Co doped TiO2	Agglomerated particles	20	500 W Xe lamp	RhB	65	240	43
CdS	Quantum dots	20 ppm	125 W Hg lamp	RhB	82	60	44
MoS2/NiFe	Nanosheets	20 ppm	UV lamp	RhB	90	120	45
g-C3N4	Nanosheets	200 ppm	125 W Hg visible lamp	RhB	90.2	60	46
MoS2/LaFeO3	Nanosheets	20	Direct sunlight	RhB	94	60	47
MoS2/NiS2	Nanosheets	20	400 W xenon lamp	RhB	90.6	32	This work