Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 4;11(33):20173–20179. doi: 10.1039/d1ra01855h

The obtained values of the FPL calculations in comparison with the respective experiments.

No. Name F Max a W b ΔGEXPc
1 2QF6 580.7 ± 90.9 67.7 ± 12.3 −8.91
2 2QG0 764.3 ± 119.3 76.5 ± 12.9 −7.85
3 2QG2 676.2 ± 78.5 71.1 ± 8.7 −7.41
4 3K97 1065.5 ± 66.3 113.9 ± 10 −10.98
5 3K99 831.4 ± 52.5 82.7 ± 4.5 −9.91
6 3 R4M 605.7 ± 81.7 58.3 ± 9.4 −8.13
7 3R4N 651.0 ± 37.6 69.8 ± 4.4 −9.45
8 3R4O 1140.8 ± 128.1 126.3 ± 17.2 −11.19
9 3RLR 910.8 ± 88.1 98.8 ± 8.6 −10.33
10 4NH7 1357.1 ± 146.7 167.6 ± 28 −11.53
11 4NH8 1566.1 ± 124.2 208.5 ± 26.1 −11.70
12 4O05 1313.2 ± 88.2 164.4 ± 20.3 −10.20
13 4O07 1363.3 ± 131.0 175.7 ± 25.9 −10.13
14 4O09 1348.6 ± 102.6 163.9 ± 18.6 −10.57
15 4O0B 1318.9 ± 112.6 157.5 ± 20.8 −11.39
a

The obtained value of the mean rupture force FMax.

b

The recorded metric of the pulling work W.

c

The experimental binding free energy ΔGEXP was estimated via the reported ki. The calculated error was the standard error of the average. The unit of force and energy is in pN and kcal mol−1, respectively.