Table 4.
Glomerular classification performance for top feature sets and classifiers on the held-out test set
| Classification Metrics | Feature Selection Method | Glomerular Classification | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear Discriminant Analysis | Random Forest | Logistic Regression | ||
| Accuracy | All features | 60 | 58 | 71 |
| ANOVA | 65 | 71 | 65 | |
| GFI | 77a | 69 | 75 | |
| mRMR | 60 | 62 | 65 | |
| Precision | All features | 58 | 53 | 70 |
| ANOVA | 64 | 71 | 65 | |
| GFI | 77 | 68 | 77a | |
| mRMR | 59 | 59 | 64 | |
| Recall | All features | 60 | 56 | 70 |
| ANOVA | 63 | 70 | 64 | |
| GFI | 76a | 67 | 74 | |
| mRMR | 59 | 60 | 64 | |
| F1-score | All features | 59 | 55 | 70 |
| ANOVA | 63 | 70 | 64 | |
| GFI | 76a | 68 | 76 | |
| mRMR | 59 | 60 | 64 | |
The four feature selection methods analyzed were: all features, ANOVA F-value, GFI, and mRMR. The three classifiers analyzed were LDA, RF, and LR. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score classification performance metrics were evaluated. ANOVA, ANOVA F-value; GFI, Gini feature importance; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; RF, random forest; LR, logistic regression; mRMR, maximum relevance minimum redundancy.
Indicates the model that achieved the best classification performance.