TABLE 4.
Study-and population-level parameter estimates for β0, β10, β11, logQ0, and α0 using both one-step and two-step approaches.
| Project | β0k (MC SE) | β10k (MC SE) | β11k (MC SE) | logQ0k (MC SE) | α0k (MC SE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Quit & Win One-step approach |
−2.56 (0.16) | 2.83 (0.18) | −1.58 (0.21) | 2.69 (0.03) | 0.44 (0.04) |
| Two-step approach | −2.79 (0.19) | 2.79 (0.22) | −1.40 (0.24) | 2.70 (0.03) | 0.37 (0.02) |
| CENIC1 P1 One-step approach |
−1.28 (0.11) | 2.77 (0.18) | −2.67 (0.21) | 3.06 (0.03) | 0.56 (0.03) |
| Two-step approach | −1.50 (0.12) | 2.28 (0.16) | −2.40 (0.19) | 2.96 (0.04) | 0.52 (0.04) |
| CENIC1 P2 One-step approach |
−1.49 (0.09) | 2.79 (0.18) | −2.53 (0.18) | 3.03 (0.02) | 0.48 (0.03) |
| Two-step approach | −1.50 (0.09) | 2.24 (0.12) | −2.20 (0.17) | 2.98 (0.02) | 0.51 (0.02) |
| COMET1 4A One-step approach |
−2.97 (0.20) | 2.98 (0.23) | −1.85 (0.33) | 3.12 (0.05) | 0.67 (0.04) |
| Two-step approach | −2.79 (0.23) | 2.55 (0.27) | −1.64 (0.38) | 3.22 (0.06) | 1.38 (0.06) |
| COMET1 4B One-step approach |
−2.43 (0.21) | 2.81 (0.23) | −2.16 (0.31) | 3.01 (0.05) | 0.43 (0.05) |
| Two-step approach | −3.43 (0.60) | 3.49 (0.56) | −2.12 (0.63) | 3.02 (0.06) | 0.65 (0.16) |
| COMET1 4C One-step approach |
−2.41 (0.20) | 3.07 (0.32) | −1.70 (0.39) | 3.03 (0.04) | 0.44 (0.04) |
| Two-step approach | −2.23 (0.30) | 3.38 (0.48) | −1.94 (0.57) | 3.05 (0.05) | 0.35 (0.02) |
| Summary One-step approach |
−2.10 (0.42) | 2.86 (0.21) | −2.03 (0.36) | 2.99 (0.10) | 0.50 (0.07) |
| Two-step approach | −2.22 (0.19) | 2.72 (0.10) | −2.05 (0.14) | 2.99 (0.04) | 0.56 (0.08) |
Note. MC SE: Monte Carlo standard error.