Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Microbiol. 2021 Dec 1;173(3):103901. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2021.103901

Fig. 2. AcrBS966A exhibits enlarged proximal pockets and distal pockets.

Fig. 2.

The distributions of distance of postulated gate (A) and external cleft (B) in each protomer during 100s MD simulations displayed no difference for wild-type AcrB, AcrBL118M and AcrBS966A. The volumes of three proximal pockets (C) and one distal pocket (D) of AcrBS966A were significantly enlarged compared to wild-type AcrB, while those of AcrBL118M showed no difference.