Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Promot. 2019 Apr 7;33(7):1009–1019. doi: 10.1177/0890117119841407

Table 3.

Impact of interventions on employee sleep behavior and quality ratings (n=20 studies).

First Author Year Intervention Sleep
Duration
Measure
Behavior Change Techniques
(BCTs)
Main Findings (Detailed)* Main
Findings
(Brief)
Study
Quality
Adachi 2003 Sleep hygiene Self-report a) self-monitoring
b) goal setting (behavior)
c) rewards contingent on behavior
Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration (5.96 to 6.1h/night, p-value <0.01) + 53.8%
Adachi 2008 Sleep hygiene Self-report a) instructional seminar
b) follow-up prompts
c) self-monitoring
d) rewards contingent on behavior
Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration (5.52 to 5.97h/night, p-value <0.05) + 57.7%
Adler 2017 Sleep hygiene Self-report a) self-monitoring
b) follow-up prompts
Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration (p-value =0.05) + 86.5%
Chen 2010 Sleep hygiene Self-report (PSQI) a) instructional seminar Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration (PSQI sleep duration subcomponent at baseline=1.0 v. follow-up:0.6: p-value =0.002) + 57.7%
de Bruin 2017 Yoga Self-report a) instructional seminar
b) behavioral modeling
c) practice session(s)
Participants who received the intervention reported increased sleep duration (7.0 to 7.4 h/night), although no p-value was provided to determine significance NC 53.8%
Hallman 2017 Physical activity Self-report a) instructional seminar(s)
b) practice session(s)
Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration (7.20 v. 7.30h/night, p=n.s) NC 82.7%
Itani 2018 Sleep hygiene PSQI a) instructional session
b) follow-up prompts
Participation in the intervention, compared to control, was not associated with a significant increase in sleep duration as measured by PSQI (p=.218) NC 49.4%
Jarnefelt 2012 CBTI Self-report, actigraph a) instructional seminar (CBTI) Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in reported duration (7.3 to 7.7h/night, p=0.027), but not according to actigraphy (p-value =n.s.). + 80.8%
Jarnefelt 2014 CBTI Self-report a) instructional seminar(s) (CBTI)
b) one-on-one coaching
Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration (7.1 to 7.5h/night, p-value =0.05) + 57.7%
Kakinuma 2010 Sleep hygiene Self-report a) instructional seminar(s)
b) self-monitoring
c) follow-up prompts
Participation in the intervention was not associated with an improvement in sleep duration (0.03 v. 0.07h/night, p-value =0.69) NC 78.8%
Klatt 2009 Yoga Self-report (PSQI sleep duration) a) instructional seminar(s)
b) self-monitoring
Participants in the intervention was associated with an improvement in PSQI global (6.73 to 5.00, p-value: 0.0018); but not in PSQI sleep duration (0.91 to 0.82, p-value=.3287) + 80.8%
Klatt 2017 Yoga Self-report (PSQI) a) instructional seminar(s)
b) goal-setting
Among participants who received the intervention, PSQI scores improved (5.93v. 3.89, p-value=.005) + 71.2%
Li 2017 Physical activity Self-report a) environmental restructuring (sit/stand workstations provided)
b) follow-up prompts
Participation in the intervention as not associated with an increase in sleep quantity (p-value=.708) NC 71.2%
Nakada 2018 Mental health intervention Self-report, actigraph a) instructional session
b) self-monitoring
Participation in the intervention, compared to control, was associated with a significant increase in sleep duration as measured by actigraphy intervention: 5.1 v 4.6 h; p=.036.) + 54.32%
Marino 2016 Schedule control Self-report, actigraph a) instructional session(s) (result-based work culture)
b) behavioral modeling
c) goal setting
Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration (employees p-value=.179, managers=.321). NC 76.9%
Olson 2015 Schedule control Self-report, actigraph a) instructional session(s) (result-based work culture)
b) behavioral modeling
c) goal setting
Participation in the intervention was associated with an increase in sleep duration according to actigraphy (p-value=.041) + 80.8%
Schiller 2017 Schedule control Self-report a) environmental restructuring (reduced working hours per week by 25% Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration (p-value=.263) NC 76.9%
Suzuki 2008 Sleep hygiene Self-report (PSQI) a) instructional seminar(s) (sleep hygiene)
b) self-monitoring
c) follow-up prompts
Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration (5.83 v. 5.88h/night, p-value =.09); but PSQI global did improve (7.70 v. 7.40, p-value =.009) NC 65.4%
Takahashi 2004 Napping Actigraph a) practice session(s) (napping) Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration according to actigraphy 5.6 v. 5.6h/night; p-value =n.s.) NC 69.2%
Trousselard 2014 Stress reduction Self-report a) instructional seminar(s) Participation in the intervention was not associated with an increase in sleep duration (6.5 v. 6.5hh/night, p-value=.890) NC 61.5%

Quality ratings: High >80.8%; Moderate 42.2-80.8%; Low: <42.2%.

Adler et al.,[41] used biofeedback from actigraphy in the intervention, yet did not report actigraphy output, thus self-report only is noted as the sleep duration measure.

*

Main findings are reflected from the published papers. In some cases, authors present change scores, in other cases authors compare follow-up sleep duration between intervention and control. Findings are displayed, consequently, either as sleep quantity (e.g., h/night), differences (e.g., 0.2 h/night more than control), or PSQI global from 0 to 21 (higher scores indicate work sleep outcomes), or PSQI sleep duration from 0 to 3 (0: <7h/night; 1: 6-7h/night; 2: 7-8h/night; 3:>8h/night.