Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;25(5):104174. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104174

Table 3.

Selected examples of various textile-based energy harvesters fabricated via top-down and bottom-up strategies

Harvester type Material/Type Fabrication Features Max power Ref
Solar CuI, ZnO,Dye, Cu, PBT wire Chemical plating/electroplating Flexible 0.4 mW (Chen et al., 2016)
PCBM, Perroveskite, PEDOT:PSS, CNT Printed/coated (top down) Flexible 12.69 mA/cm2 Jsc
0.82 V Voc
(Jung et al., 2018)
BFC GOx + BOD on SWCNT-PEDOT:PSS yarn Bi-scrolled yarn (bottom up) Flexible 1.5 mW/cm2 (Kwon et al., 2014)
LOx + Ag2O on MWCNT Printed, drop casting (top down) Flexible, stretchable 250 uW/cm2 (Chen et al., 2019; Lv et al., 2018)
PENG Carbon black, PVDF, polyethylene fiber Melt-spun (bottom up) Flexible, washable 8 uW (Lund et al., 2018)
PZT, Ag nanoparticles Printed, die pressed (top down) Flexible 0.45 uW/cm3 (Almusallam et al., 2017)
TENG Cu/PTFE strips Cut strips, woven (bottom up) Flexible 0.8 mW (Chen et al., 2016)
Ni/Parylene Electroless/chemical vapor deposition (top down) Flexible, washable 4 mW (Pu et al., 2016b)
TEG SWCNT, PEI yarn Colloidal gelation extrusion Flexible, washable 0.1 uW (Ding et al., 2020)
PEDOT:SS, Na(NiETT), PVDF Printed (top down) Flexible, washable 0.5 nW (Elmoughni et al., 2019)