TABLE 4.
Effects of patient factors, type of tooth, treatment visits on extraction adjusted using Cox regression analysis
Parameters | Hazard ratioa | Standard error | P | 95% confidence interval |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Male | ref. | |||
Female | 0.704 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.693-0.714 |
Age (years) | ||||
20-29 | ref. | |||
30-49 | 1.719 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 1.671-1.767 |
50-64 | 2.563 | 0.024 | 0.000 | 2.490-2.638 |
≧65 | 2.959 | 0.027 | 0.000 | 2.864-3.058 |
Household income quantile | ||||
Low | ref. | |||
Highest | 0.934 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.910-0.958 |
High-middle | 0.950 | 0.010 | 0.006 | 0.924-0.977 |
High | 0.947 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.922-0.972 |
Low-middle | 0.976 | 0.010 | 0.108 | 0.949-1.005 |
Lowest (Medical beneficiary) | 0.995 | 0.033 | 0.937 | 0.907-1.090 |
Health insurance subscription type | ||||
Local subscribers | ref. | |||
Employee | 0.952 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.945-0.960 |
Institution type | ||||
Local clinic | ref. | |||
Hospital | 1.054 | 0.020 | 0.353 | 0.993-1.120 |
Tertiary Hospital | 0.949 | 0.037 | 0.300 | 0.849-1.061 |
Number of visits | ||||
Single-visit for treatment | ref. | |||
Multiple visits for treatment | 0.802 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.788-0.816 |
Tooth type | ||||
Mandibular molar | ref. | |||
Mandibular premolar | 0.954 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.937-0.972 |
Mandibular anteriors | 0.674 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.658-0.691 |
Maxillary molar | 0.514 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.499-0.530 |
Maxillary premolar | 0.506 | 0.005 | 0.000 | 0.491-0.521 |
Maxillary anteriors | 0.440 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.420-0.460 |
aHazard ratio is the relative risk of having adverse reaction when compared with the reference group=1. A hazard ratio >1 indicates a higher risk of developing an adverse outcome (i.e., loss of tooth) relative to the reference group=1