Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 25;50(3):325–336. doi: 10.1007/s10615-022-00844-0

Table 1.

Theme 1: It is a “much more remote experience”

Sub-theme 1: There are “Untangible [sic]” losses

It is effective but in-person treatment has an untangible [sic] quality that telehealth does not

…new patients I work with online don't seem to take the therapy as seriously when they're in their own home and/or surrounded by people and the things of their home life. It's therefore a much more remote experience I think in every way

Working mostly in a telehealth capacity has made the work less rich, and less satisfying overall. Although many of my patients I have had for years and have an established rapport, there's still that fullness of the in-person session that is lost and can't be thoroughly replicated online

Sub-theme 2: Specific losses can be identified
 Body language cues

The encounter is intensified, in the focus on facial expression, and enervating. At the same time, information that can be gleaned from posture, attitude, even fidgeting, is lost

I miss the immediacy of the in person, whole body encounter

Missing body language. Difficult to perform initial evaluation

 Eye contact

I cannot look person in the eyes and do not feel presence in the same way as in person

The biggest impact is being unable to see clients face to face. There is something lost having a session virtually

 Nuance

It's impossible to pick up the nuances of body language and emotional shifts from clients. Some sessions are more like "life coach" than therapy. That's not my thing

Video “smooths” out detail making nuances of facial expression indiscernible

 Focus (due to distractions)

More distractions and interruptions

Client is more focused in person

Some challenges with clients being distracted or multitasking during sessions

Subtheme 3: There are therapeutic frame and therapeutic relationship changes
 The therapeutic frame is disrupted: office rituals and sense of safe space are lost

One of the most impactful ways COVID19 has interrupted services is by disrupting the framework of therapy. There is a stronger need to reestablish the therapeutic frame virtually and continue to monitor it. Clients also have vocalized the impact of the absence of the physical office space which ensured privacy

...lost ritual of coming to the office for sessions

Providing teletherapy from home is much harder than you would think. Just finding privacy is difficult with kids/spouses/pets. And it is for clients, also

Some clients have to be in their cars because family members are home

 Technology impacts the therapeutic relationship

Tele-health platforms take away from the practice of psychotherapy, as each session time is spent on how to connect, rather than in connecting

You can’t see the whole person, there is buffering and technology glitches and it’s easy for the client to be interrupted

 It’s harder to build relationships with new clients

And taking new patients is definitely not the same—it's harder to get to know a new patient and vice versa, AND I think there's less staying power in it

I think the most difficult issue is creating a therapeutic alliance with new clients

As long as we already have a relationship it is just as good. If it’s a new client, it’s difficult to connect

 “The screen is a barrier”: Emotional connection and embodied use of self are impaired

More difficult to make emotional connection for therapeutic alliance

I also realize how often I shift my posture to bring people in for greater intimacy or to calm someone, so this has hurt my ability to be more direct and confront clients. They are already struggling and there isn't a way to use my whole self to bring calm to sessions

It's more difficult to attend to a client's emotional needs remotely. The screen is a barrier