Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan 23;2008(1):CD004024. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004024.pub2

2. Preparative regimens and mobilization technique.

Study Preparative regimen Mobilization tech.
De Souza BEAM (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/m² MEL) not clarified
Martelli 2003 BEAC (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/kg CY) G‐CSF 24h after MACOP‐B week 8 OR G‐CSF alone 2 weeks after MACOP‐B
Gianni 30 pts: TBI (12.5 Gy total) + 120‐140 mg/m² MEL, then (due to tox.) 18 pts: MITOX 60 mg/m² + MEL 180 mg/m² Phase II: HD‐CY (7 g/m²) + G‐CSF or GM‐CSF
Gisselbrecht BEAM (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/m² MEL) after 1st or 2nd ECVBP cycle + G‐CSF
Haioun CBV (6000 mg/m² CY, 300 mg/m² CARM, 1000 mg/m² ETO) after 1st or 2nd HD‐MTX course (G‐CSF not mentioned)
Intragumtonchai TBI (12 Gy total) OR 450 mg/m² CARM, 60 mg/kg ETO, 120 mg/kg CY 7 days after last ESHAP: G‐CSF
Kaiser BEAM (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/m² MEL) after 2. or 3. CHOEP with G‐CSF
Kluin‐Nelemans BEAC (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/kg CY) between 4th and 6th CHVmP/BV cycle + G‐CSF or GM‐CSF
Martelli 1996 BEAC (300 mg/m² CARM, 800 mg/m² ETO, 800 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/kg CY) bone marrow collection at a median of 10 days after response evaluation
Milpied BEAM (300 mg/m² CARM, 1600 mg/m² ETO, 1600 mg/m² CYTA, 140 mg/m² MEL) after 1st or 2nd CEEP
Rodriguez 2003 BEAM stem cell collection after 3x ATT and 2 intensified dose chemotherapy
Santini 1998 BEAM (according to Mills) bone marrow collection after last VACOP‐B cycle
Santini 2003 BEAM peripheral blood progenitor cells were collected after HD‐CY plus G‐CSF
Verdonck 120 mg/kg CY + TBI (8 Gy total [1 fraction only]) bone marrow collection after 3x CHOP
Vitolo 60 mg/m² MITOX + 180 mg/m² MEL not clarified