Table 5.
Model 1 Internalizing | Model 2 Externalizing | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||
n = 154 | b | SE | Adj. R2 | b | SE | Adj. R2 |
Step 1 | ||||||
Intercept | −0.16*** | 0.01 | .06 | −0.16*** | 0.01 | .06 |
Child Behavior | −0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
Latinx | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | ||
Parent Report | ||||||
Praise | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
Physical affection | −0.04** | 0.01 | −0.03* | 0.01 | ||
Stress | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Child Report | ||||||
Positive parent | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||
Negative parent | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||
Step 2 | ||||||
Child Behavior x Praise | −0.00 | 0.00 | .05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Child Behavior x Physical affection | 0.00 | 0.00 | .05 | −0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Child Behavior x Stress | −0.00 | 0.00 | .05 | −0.00 | 0.00 | .07 |
Child Behavior x Positive | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Child Behavior x Negative | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Step 3 | ||||||
Ch. Beh x Praise x Lat. | 0.00 | 0.01 | .04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Ch. Beh x Phys. Affection x Lat. | 0.04* | 0.02 | .13 | 0.01** | 0.00 | .18 |
Ch. Beh x Stress x Lat. | 0.00 | 0.00 | .04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .08 |
Ch. Beh x Positive x Lat. | 0.00 | 0.01 | .04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | .06 |
Ch. Beh x Negative x Lat. | 0.00 | 0.01 | .05 | 0.01** | 0.00 | .12 |
Note. Models controlled for age and weekend cortisol. 2-way and 3-way interactions were tested in separate models. Models with 3-way interactions controlled for all relevant 2-way interactions. DEC = daily decline.
p < .0167,
p < .01,
p < .001