Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2022 May;64(4):e22263. doi: 10.1002/dev.22263

Table 5.

Children’s DEC as a Function of Parent-Child Tie, Child Behavioral Problems, and Ethnicity

Model 1 Internalizing Model 2 Externalizing

n = 154 b SE Adj. R2 b SE Adj. R2
Step 1
  Intercept −0.16*** 0.01 .06 −0.16*** 0.01 .06
  Child Behavior −0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
  Latinx 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01
  Parent Report
 Praise 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
 Physical affection −0.04** 0.01 −0.03* 0.01
 Stress 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
  Child Report
 Positive parent 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
 Negative parent 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.01
Step 2
  Child Behavior x Praise −0.00 0.00 .05 0.00 0.00 .06
  Child Behavior x Physical affection 0.00 0.00 .05 −0.00 0.00 .06
  Child Behavior x Stress −0.00 0.00 .05 −0.00 0.00 .07
  Child Behavior x Positive 0.00 0.00 .06 0.00 0.00 .06
  Child Behavior x Negative 0.00 0.00 .06 0.00 0.00 .06
Step 3
  Ch. Beh x Praise x Lat. 0.00 0.01 .04 0.00 0.00 .06
  Ch. Beh x Phys. Affection x Lat. 0.04* 0.02 .13 0.01** 0.00 .18
  Ch. Beh x Stress x Lat. 0.00 0.00 .04 0.00 0.00 .08
  Ch. Beh x Positive x Lat. 0.00 0.01 .04 0.00 0.00 .06
  Ch. Beh x Negative x Lat. 0.00 0.01 .05 0.01** 0.00 .12

Note. Models controlled for age and weekend cortisol. 2-way and 3-way interactions were tested in separate models. Models with 3-way interactions controlled for all relevant 2-way interactions. DEC = daily decline.

*

p < .0167,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001