Table 6.
Children’s AUC as a Function of Parent-Child Tie, Child Behavioral Problems, and Ethnicity
| Model 1 Internalizing | Model 2 Externalizing | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||
| n = 143 | b | SE | Adj. R2 | b | SE | Adj. R2 |
| Step 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | 16.02*** | 0.98 | .09 | 16.00*** | 0.96 | .11 |
| Child Behavior | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.15 | ||
| Latinx | −0.50 | 1.01 | −0.32 | 1.00 | ||
| Parent Report | ||||||
| Praise | −1.28 | 1.22 | −1.04 | 1.20 | ||
| Physical affection | −3.27* | 1.32 | −3.05 | 1.31 | ||
| Stress | −1.54 | 1.19 | −2.01 | 1.17 | ||
| Child Report | ||||||
| Positive parent | 1.34 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 1.53 | ||
| Negative parent | −0.54 | 0.95 | −0.49 | 0.93 | ||
| Step 2 | ||||||
| Child Behavior x Praise | −0.41 | 0.35 | .09 | −0.46* | 0.18 | .15 |
| Child Behavior x Physical affection | 0.17 | 0.37 | .08 | −0.47 | 0.22 | .14 |
| Child Behavior x Stress | 0.18 | 0.30 | .08 | 0.00 | 0.22 | .11 |
| Child Behavior x Positive | 0.24 | 0.35 | .08 | 0.26 | 0.19 | .12 |
| Child Behavior x Negative | 0.16 | 0.25 | .08 | −0.01 | 0.16 | .11 |
| Step 3 | ||||||
| Ch. Beh x Praise x Lat. | 0.62 | 0.57 | .10 | 0.15 | 0.36 | .15 |
| Ch. Beh x Phys. Affection x Lat. | 0.05 | 1.78 | .06 | 0.58 | 0.51 | .13 |
| Ch. Beh x Stress x Lat. | −0.07 | 0.37 | .07 | −0.04 | 0.31 | .09 |
| Ch. Beh x Positive x Lat. | −0.86 | 0.98 | .07 | −0.51 | 0.58 | .11 |
| Ch. Beh x Negative x Lat. | 0.28 | 0.57 | .09 | 0.11 | 0.28 | .11 |
Note. Models controlled for age and weekend cortisol. 2-way and 3-way interactions were tested in separate models. Models with 3-way interactions controlled for all relevant 2-way interactions. AUC = area under the curve.
*
p < .0167,
**
p < .01,
***
p < .001